Addendum I
The Number Line Argument
Still need convincing? Perhaps you think that relativity is a purely
subjective illusion, lacking in truth... perhaps you suspect that
underneath lies a more profound ACTUALITY, wherein two spacecraft each
retreating from Earth at .75c in opposite directions DO exceed light
speed (thus can NOT communicate with one another). Youd be wrong,
and heres why.
When you count the number of grains of sand in a jar, or on a beach, or
on a continent, a planet, a galaxy; that Number Line starts with zero,
one, two
and can go all the way up to any imaginable zenith. That
would be an example of a perfectly flat, or unremarkable,
numeric continuum.
But velocity is a trait constrained by Nature: its range cannot
extend to just any arbitrary pinnacle, because then wed live in a
world where objects could outrun being seen, and in a world where
objects could ram you with devastating impact before you could even see
them coming. No! this is one area where nature has laid down the law with an
iron fist: light is the quintessential mediator of all that
exists and so her unique speed is inviolable, and expressly tantamount
to an infinity. Hence, the Number Line representing velocity is not a
flat continuum, but is somehow fundamentally skewed a skew, clearly,
that cuts into both the spatial and temporal components of velocity.
So it shouldnt come as any surprise that a special computation
needs be employed to add or subtract velocities, to deduce their value
per a moving reference frame. However confident we may be that one jelly bean plus one jelly bean equals two jelly beans, it doesnt follow that one MPH plus one MPH equals two MPH. The test results are in, and the findings leave little doubt that relativity
is our reality, and not some illusion.
Copyright © 2001 - 2004, KJS
All rights reserved
To Addendum II, The
Perspective Analogy
Back to Main
Essay